#################### PYOTE 4.2.0 session started: Mon Feb 7 19:44:24 2022 #################### filename: G:/Documents and Settings/IOTA/Richard Nolthenius/Tardis/Kirk Bender/(3325) Tardis Bender PyMovie TG.PYOTE.PYOTE.trimmed.csv If the csv file came from PyMovie - columns with prefix: signal will be read. ==================== file header lines ==================== # PyMovie file written by PYOTE 4.2.0 # # PyMovie file written by PYOTE 4.2.0 # # # PyMovie Version 3.3.1 # # # source: G:\Documents and Settings\IOTA\Richard Nolthenius\Tardis\Kirk Bender\20220131_3325_TARDIS_Bender.avi # # # # # # lunar background: False # # # yellow mask = default: False # # # # # # aperture name: target # # # ____ aperture size: 31 # # # ____ x,y: (322, 209) # # # ____ threshold: 4 # # # ____ def mask radius: 4.0 # # # ____ color: red # # # ____ joggable: True # # # ____ auto textOut: False # # # ____ thumbnail source: True # # # ____ csv output order: 0 # # # # # # aperture name: tracking1 # # # ____ aperture size: 31 # # # ____ x,y: (579, 106) # # # ____ threshold: 6 # # # ____ def mask radius: 4.0 # # # ____ color: yellow # # # ____ joggable: False # # # ____ auto textOut: False # # # ____ thumbnail source: False # # # ____ csv output order: 1 # # # # # # aperture name: Tracking2-Comparison # # # ____ aperture size: 31 # # # ____ x,y: (25, 375) # # # ____ threshold: 6 # # # ____ def mask radius: 4.0 # # # ____ color: yellow # # # ____ joggable: True # # # ____ auto textOut: True # # # ____ thumbnail source: False # # # ____ csv output order: 2 # # # ==================== end header lines ==================== timeDelta: 0.0667321 seconds per reading timestamp error rate: 0.00% Analyze data 1 selected - PyMovie aperture name: target (signal) Locate an "R only" event triggered minEvent: 1 maxEvent: 25 Number of candidate solutions: 60875 (using event min/max entries) New solver results... Integer (non-subframe) solution... sigB:97.46 sigA:0.00 B:387.05 A:81.91 in entryNum units: D: 524 R: 526 noise corr coefs: [1.00, 0.0679] (based on 2446 points) sigmaB: 96.15 Subframe adjusted solution... sigB:96.15 sigA:96.15 B:387.05 A:81.91 in entryNum units: D: 524 R: 526 D(subframe): 524.0000 R(subframe): 526.0000 in frameNum units: D: 886 R: 888 D(subframe): 886.0000 R(subframe): 888.0000 ... end New solver results Locate a "D and R" event triggered minEvent: 5 maxEvent: 25 Number of candidate solutions: 51093 (using event min/max entries) New solver results... Integer (non-subframe) solution... sigB:97.21 sigA:69.16 B:387.76 A:246.23 in entryNum units: D: 934 R: 949 noise corr coefs: [1.00, 0.0576] (based on 2433 points) sigmaB: 95.95 Subframe adjusted solution... sigB:95.95 sigA:68.61 B:387.74 A:241.91 in entryNum units: D: 934 R: 949 D(subframe): 934.0000 R(subframe): 949.0000 in frameNum units: D: 1296 R: 1311 D(subframe): 1296.0000 R(subframe): 1311.0000 ... end New solver results Error bar report based on 100,000 simulations (units are readings)... loDbar @ .68 ci: -0.9836 hiDbar @ .68 ci: 0.8482 loDbar @ .95 ci: -3.9419 hiDbar @ .95 ci: 3.2222 loDbar @ .9973 ci: -9.7921 hiDbar @ .9973 ci: 8.5945 loDurBar @ .68 ci: -1.7103 hiDurBar @ .68 ci: 1.6592 loDurBar @ .95 ci: -5.1120 hiDurBar @ .95 ci: 5.0464 loDurBar @ .9973 ci: -11.0732 hiDurBar @ .9973 ci: 11.8127 Timestamp validity check ... From timestamps at D and R, calculated 15 reading blocks. From reading blocks, calculated 15 blocks. Timestamps appear valid @ D and R ================= 0.68 containment interval report ================= B: 387.74 {+/- 1.95} sigmaB: 95.95 A: 241.91 {+/- 18.34} sigmaA: 68.61 magDrop: 0.512 +/- 0.082 (0.68 ci) snr: 1.52 D: 2230.00 {+0.85,-0.98} (frame number) D: [10:08:36.3484] {+0.0566,-0.0656} seconds R: 2260.00 {+0.98,-0.85} (frame number) R: [10:08:37.3494] {+0.0656,-0.0566} seconds Duration (R - D): 15.0000 {+1.6848,-1.6848} readings Duration (R - D): 1.0010 {+0.1124,-0.1124} seconds =============== end 0.68 containment interval report =============== ================= 0.95 containment interval report ================= B: 387.74 {+/- 3.89} sigmaB: 95.95 A: 241.91 {+/- 36.68} sigmaA: 68.61 magDrop: 0.512 +/- 0.165 (0.95 ci) snr: 1.52 D: 2230.00 {+3.22,-3.94} (frame number) D: [10:08:36.3484] {+0.2150,-0.2631} seconds R: 2260.00 {+3.94,-3.22} (frame number) R: [10:08:37.3494] {+0.2631,-0.2150} seconds Duration (R - D): 15.0000 {+5.0792,-5.0792} readings Duration (R - D): 1.0010 {+0.3389,-0.3389} seconds =============== end 0.95 containment interval report =============== ================= 0.9973 containment interval report =============== B: 387.74 {+/- 5.84} sigmaB: 95.95 A: 241.91 {+/- 55.01} sigmaA: 68.61 magDrop: 0.512 +/- 0.247 (0.9973 ci) snr: 1.52 D: 2230.00 {+8.59,-9.79} (frame number) D: [10:08:36.3484] {+0.5735,-0.6534} seconds R: 2260.00 {+9.79,-8.59} (frame number) R: [10:08:37.3494] {+0.6534,-0.5735} seconds Duration (R - D): 15.0000 {+11.4429,-11.4429} readings Duration (R - D): 1.0010 {+0.7636,-0.7636} seconds =============== end 0.9973 containment interval report ============= D frame number: 2230.00 D: 0.6800 containment intervals: {+/- 0.98} (readings) D: 0.9500 containment intervals: {+/- 3.94} (readings) D: 0.9973 containment intervals: {+/- 9.79} (readings) R frame number: 2260.00 R: 0.6800 containment intervals: {+/- 0.98} (readings) R: 0.9500 containment intervals: {+/- 3.94} (readings) R: 0.9973 containment intervals: {+/- 9.79} (readings) Duration (R - D): 15.0000 readings Duration: 0.6800 containment intervals: {+/- 1.6848} (readings) Duration: 0.9500 containment intervals: {+/- 5.0792} (readings) Duration: 0.9973 containment intervals: {+/- 11.4429} (readings) =============== Summary report for Excel file ===================== This light curve has not been block integrated. The following lightcurve parameters were utilized: ==== use diff: is checked ==== exp: 0.066732 Night Eagle 3 exponential curve fitting was employed with parameters: ==== y position of target: 0 This 'drop' has a 0.0000 probability of being an artifact of noise. >>>> probability > 0.0000 indicates the 'drop' may be spurious (a noise artifact). Consult with an IOTA Regional Coordinator. >>>> probability = 0.0000 indicates the 'drop' is unlikely to be a noise artifact, but does not prove that the 'drop' is due to an occultation >>>> Consider 'drop' shape, timing, mag drop, duration and other positive observer chords before reporting the 'drop' as a positive. All times are calculated/reported based on the assumption that timestamps are start-of-exposure times. It is critical that you make appropriate time adjustments when timestamps are NOT start-of-exposure times. If you use the North American Excel Spreadsheet report, all times will be properly corrected for camera delay and reported start-of-exposure times. For other users worldwide, use the appropriate corrections documented in the North American Spreadsheet report form - use the documentation shown on the Corrections Tables tab. magDrop: 0.512 +/- 0.165 (0.95 ci) snr: 1.52 D time: [10:08:36.3484] D: 0.6800 containment intervals: {+/- 0.0656} seconds D: 0.9500 containment intervals: {+/- 0.2631} seconds D: 0.9973 containment intervals: {+/- 0.6534} seconds R time: [10:08:37.3494] R: 0.6800 containment intervals: {+/- 0.0656} seconds R: 0.9500 containment intervals: {+/- 0.2631} seconds R: 0.9973 containment intervals: {+/- 0.6534} seconds Duration (R - D): 1.0010 seconds Duration: 0.6800 containment intervals: {+/- 0.1124} seconds Duration: 0.9500 containment intervals: {+/- 0.3389} seconds Duration: 0.9973 containment intervals: {+/- 0.7636} seconds Enter D and R error bars for each containment interval in Excel spreadsheet without + or - sign (assumed to be +/-) =========== end Summary report for Excel file ===================== Solution 'envelope' in the main plot drawn using 0.95 containment interval error bars Background region selected: [0, 935] Background region selected: [949, 2448] Baseline noise analysis done using 2436 baseline points noise corr coefs: [1.00, 0.0578] (based on 2436 points) sigmaB: 96.08 mean baseline = 387.70 baseline snr = 4.04 Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 2.00 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.90 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.80 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.70 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.60 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.50 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.40 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.30 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.20 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.10 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 1.00 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.90 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.80 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.70 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.60 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.50 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.40 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.30 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 5.90 dur(secs): 0.20 event Undetectability reached at magDrop: 5.90 duration=: 0.20 An event of duration 0.30 seconds with magDrop: 5.9 is likely detectable. Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 2.00 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 1.90 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 1.80 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 1.70 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 1.60 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 1.50 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 1.40 event Processing detectability of magDrop: 0.50 dur(secs): 1.30 event Undetectability reached at magDrop: 0.50 duration=: 1.30 An event of duration 1.40 seconds with magDrop: 0.5 is likely detectable.