The Occultation of a 11.2 star by the Asteroid (604) Tekmessa

Apr 12, 2023 at 11:29:59pm

 

This high rank event skims the coast from Santa Cruz north to Davenport, and otherwise needs to be tried from south of Moss Landing. We're hoping for fog-free conditions, in which case I plan to try it from Coast Rd 7 miles north of Santa Cruz. Kirk will probably try from home. It's 32 degrees up at Azimuth 281 in Gemini. The odds of a hit from Karl's in the SC . mountains is small. However, we're all 3 trying it. Kirk from home.

   

 

Results:

Good success. Karl, Kirk, and I all got successful tapings. Kirk and I had ~1 sec events, and Karl, as the path suggested, got a miss.

 

Richard Nolthenius (PyOTE log file)

I observed from as deep into the path as I could conveniently get and still be in Santa Cruz County; I drove up Hwy 1 to Coast Road, and set up on the north intersection of Coast Rd and Hwy 1, a bit awkwardly in the road to avoid power lines. Skies are excellent and I got a good taping at a high time resolution using 2x.

PyMovie 3.7.3 screen

I used 2 tracking stars (blue, yellow), the target (green), and the sky (red)

It didn't really change the solution, but I did decide to use the Tracking2 star as a reference star, with period = 16 smoothed.

PyMovie's raw data for the target. I did not use integration, instead using 2x (1 frame per integration),

Zoomed in on the 1.2 second occultation. We were near the northern limit, with predicted full diamter occultation of 3.1 seconds, so there may be some gradual'ness in the D and R because of the near grazing incident angle

The historgram is solid zero-chance of a false positive

The PyOTE solution, zoomed in. The D and R times have quite good timings. I've had good luck using 2x for 11th magnitude stars and getting highly precise D and R times.

     

 

KIrk Bender (PyOTE log file)

Observed from home. Got a 0.8 second occultation, and was closer to the northern limit than I was, on this steeply slanting shadow path

Got a clear positive. I started the recording in time, but I noticed a bright star was drifting into my time stamps and I was afraid it would mess up the OCR, so I stopped, re-centered, and started again, and the event occurred shortly after starting the recording. The beginning of my second recording has a scope bump in it so I trimmed that out in PyOTE.  Easily passed false positive.  Event was a little earlier than predicted, that is the predicted time was close to the R, rather than between the D and R.

magDrop report: percentDrop: 97.6  magDrop: 4.030  too much noise; cannot calculate error bars snr: 4.31 D time: [06:29:57.6067] D: 0.6800 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0176} seconds D: 0.9500 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0442} seconds D: 0.9973 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0911} seconds R time: [06:29:58.0739] R: 0.6800 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0176} seconds R: 0.9500 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0442} seconds R: 0.9973 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0911} seconds Duration (R - D): 0.4672 seconds Duration: 0.6800 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0269} seconds Duration: 0.9500 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.0613} seconds Duration: 0.9973 containment intervals:  {+/- 0.1209} seconds